|
| |
Platts' Foothills
Sentinel Columns
(posted
with the kind permission of the Foothills Sentinel
|
Posted November
2003
top
"Pen Points" Column by Geoffrey Platts
Foothills Sentinel
(publication date unknown)
Benches say much about adjustment
to the desert
I suppose you have to walk a lot to notice certain things. The
perspective of a free-limbed walker is different than that of a driver
encased in steel. For instance, there’s an awful dearth of public
seating in Carefree -- those benches that do exist are courtesy of the
shops along, say, Easy Street. I don’t know that the town provides
even a single bench outside or in. The motoring mentality prevails --
which implies that people want to rush from chore to chore, driving
hither and yon -- without a thought to resting awhile and even pondering
the natural beauty of the environs. Hardly a carefree outlook.
Even Bashas’, provider of taxes to our
community (unlike Albertson’s) and which no true Foothillster would
ever dream of abandoning, has not a single place to park one’s
posterior. Think how a pleasant sitting nook would add to the well-being
of the customer -- all the more so in an area of older residents. It
wouldn’t cost Bashas’ that much -- and it would be a gracious and
obliging gesture to the customers that remain faithful to them. Simply
somewhere to sit down for a few minutes -- not a lot to ask of the
store. England’s supermarkets are now ahead of the U.S. in comforts
and conveniences, ranging from small lounges to clean toilets, baby care
cubicles, inside pay phones and direct lines to taxis.
A Bashas’ scouting trip to Britain would
pay great dividends for company and shoppers alike. Not being choosy
personally, I fling my fundament wherever fancy takes me -- though with
a firm preference for boulder over barrel cactus. I don’t really need
any benches, at least at this stage of my life, but I’m convinced that
if the Town of Carefree invested in some they’d be greatly valued by
the many visitors in the winter months.
A widespread custom in England is to use the
bench as a special memorial for departed friends and family. The bench,
elaborate and simple, is purchased privately -- and then, with
permission, positioned publicly. A loving remembrance is then inscribed
in brass for all to see for a very long time.
In my hometown of Harrogate, Yorkshire these
“In Memoriam” resting spots are not only everywhere -- but are
appreciatively used too. This is a superb idea - especially as England
is a country of avid walkers (of all ages). In the summer of ’96,
wandering through the Yorkshire Dales, my friend and I came across just
such a bench, bearing the maiden name (Stirk) of our generous-spirited
hostess Jane Holmes. It turned out to be in memory of her own mother --
but she hadn’t known of that particular bench. As I write, the idea
strongly emerges of making memorial seats for our late-lamented friends
Wendy DuPont and Ralph Sullivan. We would need to collect funds (or have
them donated), agree on the design and hardiness, choose locations --
and then get permission to install. Does the WD/RS memorial bench idea
appeal to anyone?
In addition to seats, an even more woeful
lack in Carefree is shade. It’s pretty obvious that Anglo-Saxons from
the North have historically had little understanding of how to live
feasibly with the Sun. Had the Carefree founders had any sun-sense, they
would have quickly created a central plaza dense with shade trees (as I
have seen in Mexico where they comprehend living with the Sun), and
sprinkled with miniature fountains and benches aplenty. The upshot would
have been a cool and desirable desert oasis. Nature’s refuge from the
hammering heat. No such luck, the vision wasn’t there but they meant
well did Bert Snow, H.T. Palmer and Tom Darlington (all of whom I knew
from the Carefree Inn’s original days).
The fantasy of the verdant oasis plaza fades
-- and in its place we have today’s raw reality of a stripped, bleak
dirt parking lot with just on brave bush struck in the middle of it. A
mini-Sahara to hurry across between buildings.
The scattered desert trees -- palo verde,
mesquite, etc. do their best to throw shade -- and can do quite well if
left alone. But they’re not any more -- the landscapers (landscrapers,
did I hear you say?) hack and prune away at them unrelentingly until
they’re a skeleton of their former splendid selves. Why? When that
slashing thins shade for people -- and exposes their trunks to solar
damage? Simple -- they must keep justifying their jobs -- so
shade-givers and shade-seekers, beware the dreaded Disney-deserteers.
Alas, even the buildings are not designed to
provide shade. They were not built with any Sun-consciousness. Then, why
not add colorful awnings? They’d do the job of blocking the Sun
-- and aesthetically, too. No, sorry, Continental awnings and Cinzano
parasols haven’t quite made it to Carefree yet.
So, from nowhere to sit, our bums go numb and with nowhere to run, we
broil in the sun. If we have no idea how to live harmoniously in the
South, why did our tribe ever leave the North? |
|
Posted July
2002
top
"Pen Points" Column by Geoffrey Platts
Foothills Sentinel, 15 June 1988
"Slow summer burn"
"On the brightest and warmest days my desert is
most itself because the sunshine and warmth lambent with light: the
caressing warmth envelops everything in its ardent embrace. Even when
the outlanders complain that the sun is too dazzling and too hot, we
desert lovers are prone to reply at worst, that is only too much of a
good thing. Joseph Wood Krutch. The Voice of the Desert.
Summer is upon us. In the sun's
timeless journey towards solstice, it daily climbs higher to its zenith
in the sky. The Sonoran Desert shimmers beneath its radiance. And as the
heat intensifies, so does my gladness at being in a "desert
place." Precious few others hold this view since, while I am
clasping the heat to me like a lover, most are seeking to flee it. So be
it. Each to their own.
The summer is a special time for the desert. All its intricate systems
evolved over the millennia to evade, temper or endure the sun's rays are
in full force. Yes, the desert's flora and fauna come steadfastly into
their own in this season of swelter. It is nothing short of miraculous
that desert plants day after dry day, week after rainless week can
withstand the sort of heat that would strike dead a human being exposed
to it without water for one day alone.
Are not all such plants, stately or
humble, deserving of our deep respect, then? And
all desert creatures great and small, too?
Shamefully, tragically, though, these
life-forms and their habitat which comprise our living desert we
eliminate with hardly a thought. By our collective silence, we condone
the desolation (or sad sanitization) of portions of an ecosystem, unique
on the face of this earth, that has taken 10,000 years to evolve. And
for what compelling reason? Oh, for just one local example, the building
of yet another shopping center that, if we're lucky, may get us
groceries at a few cents less.
It is high time that Nature's inherent right to exist is acknowledged
both with the mind and heart of people and in their courts of law. I
mean granting Nature "legal standing" so that where necessary
she could be defended (from, say, a potential developer-rape) by
lawyer's representation.
Wouldn't that just shake things up in
this anthropocentric world of ours? Earth advocate Mike Roselle pulled
no punches on this emerging issue of equal rights for all species. He
said, "Dammit, the natural world does have a legal right to exist,
and if we don't start screaming it from every mountain top and every
courtroom in the land, we could be guilty of complicity in the most
horrible holocaust imaginable - the willful destruction of entire
ecosystems for short-term profits."
But back to the bold and beautiful
heat... For four months out of the year, it gives the desert a respite
from those who plunder it - the "weekend warriors," the dirt
bikers, the miners, the shooters, the hunters, the woodcutters and so
on. It restores tranquility to an ancient and serene land. It brings
back the proud primeval wildness "in which," said Henry David
Thoreau, "lies the preservation of the world."
And frankly I'm a bit of a beneficiary
of all this good. Because, by going deep into the desert when the sun's
at its fiercest, I'm guaranteed that rarest of gifts in this modern
world - perfect peace and quiet. Silence. Stillness.
This I no longer have in my own day to day environment. But I do have it
out there in that tremendous, trackless desert. Which is why, on
Memorial Day, 1988, I sit beneath the shade of a juniper tree - far
removed from "Homo Noise-ius" and his maddening machines and
gunshots. All is calm.
So, burn on, Old Sol, burn on! |
|
Posted March
2002
top
"Pen Points" Column by Geoffrey Platts
Foothills Sentinel, date of publication not known
'Vultural reality' vacation
Old turkey buzzard and I have lived with one another for
several summer weeks - simply because the overnight roost of him and his
far-flying friends overlooked my wilderness camp. They were less eager
about my proximity than I was about theirs - though, for a few days,
high up there on their sycamore deadwood perches, they didn't seem to be
much bothered by my solitary padding around. Even so, I always could
feel those legendary eyes on me.
I wasn't of interest because I wasn't dead, of course. What a morsel I
would've been otherwise! Vultures, of course, are birds of death.
They're silent, black-cloaked and red-visaged - and their job is death.
Yet they're not death-dealing hawks, for example. They never kill.
They wait for death to happen and then, near miraculously, they happen
upon the fatal scene. How do they foregather in such great numbers? They
can go from five to 50 in no time. It is said they are strung out way up
there in the heavens, some miles apart but within sight of one another.
Like a sky telegraph, when one makes a sighting with those extraordinary
eyes and begins to dive, the others in line of sight follow the leader,
as it were. And thus the sudden and spectacular assembly.
When they eat they gorge because they don't get to eat often -
particularly in the more sanitized U.S. of A. Sonora, Mexico, is rife
with vultures (two species, the black and red-necked) because livestock
kills are everywhere and there is no removal. And so, the scavenging's
good.
Essentially, the zopilotes do the work there that the county health
department would do here - organically and much more cheaply.
I often wondered where they nested and it was only by sheer chance that
that knowledge came to me. I was climbing out of a remote canyon, again
in Sonora, Mexico, where a huge black bird flew out of a crevice -
almost upending me. Recovering composure, I peered into the cliff recess
and saw two large, blotched and dirty eggs lying in the dust - with a
twig or two around them. Small wonder the vultures' nests are rarely
encountered!
Though the resident vultures did eventually move down creek a couple of
trees, they continued to come back in the first hours of the morning to
the same lofty forked perch. And once, as the rays of the rising sun
were striking them, they - the four of them - did the most fabulous
thing. They spread their wings fully open and held them there motionless
- with their pale cream underfeathers aglow from the first rays.
Splendorously "spread-vultured" - a never forgotten sight.
Their polished red heads with the curved tearing beak glistened in the
sun, too.
I had previously thought that the early morning "feathers aspread"
were only seen in the first chill of fall - that it was literally a
warm-up technique. Not necessarily so - they're feather spreading in the
full warmth of a desert summer.
The more I neighbored with them, the more I came to appreciate them --
especially for their remarkable silence. They flap and jostle for
optimum position on their night perches but once pleasingly placed,
there's not a sound out of them throughout the darkness. Imagine a
treeful of rooks!
Some see them as a lugubrious bird, a harbinger of death. On the
contrary, I see them as a bearer of hope and new life - for do they not
bring the spring back with them to the desert in mid-March?
They say that no bird on earth can fly higher into the firmament than
the vulture -- a lesson for us there.
¡Viva Zopilote! |
Posted February
2002
top
“Pen Points” Column by Geoffrey Platts
Foothills Sentinel, Wed., Jan. 19, 1994
God of growth is false idol.
Quote from a letter to Supervisor “George Campbell, Maricopa
County, May 1, 1985:
“Growth must, at the very least, be questioned by the
powers-that-be. It simply cannot be allowed to ride roughshod over the
social, individual and environmental sensibilities of the present and
future.
Granted it will take the civic fortitude and political gumption to
challenge that which has been undisputed for so very long in these
parts. Yet it must be done to provide a healthy balance between economic
and eco-sociological needs.
If a bold start is not made soon by state, county and city
governments, then the seeds of chaos will germinate and Arizonans in the
none-too-distant future will reap a bitter harvest.” G.P.
“Progress, growth, industry - everything that the chamber of
commerce and the politicians love, I’m against. I think it’s
destroying Arizona and I don’t think it will survive.” Edward
Abbey, April 1983
“Growth is good, growth is God! Growth is good, growth is God!”
Yes, we hear that feverish chant, consciously, subconsciously day in,
day out. The politicos prattle it, the media reinforce it, the people
swallow it.
Instead of getting irate when the B.A.C. (Bruner and Drinkwater*)
boys push for a new road through our public lands (to Beeline Highway),
we say nothing - believing when we’re meant to believe - that growth
is good, growth is God!
Incomprehensively, we neither look around us nor up into the dirty
air. And even if we do, we may mutter or moan - but we do nothing. We
see ourselves as impotent in the face of unassailable power.
Meanwhile, knowing our timidity all too well, the politicians and
their builder-bedfellows rub their hands, cackle with unholy glee...and
hatch more plots for more growth. Oh yes, growth is good, growth is God!
They have to, they must keep going, poor souls, for they themselves
are an outgrowth of The Growth. The blind, unbridled, unquestioned
growth. Without it, they would wither away. So they build ‘til all is
killed. Just like L.A.
Never mind that the fair face of the Sonoran Desert is skinned off -
and with its skinning is lost that which gives the people here their
spirit of place, their sense of belonging in and to this lonely, lovely
land of little rain.
Gone is the wildness, tamed and shamed by the despoilers. And the
first residents, the singular Sonoran fauna, are driven further back -
fleeing from the juggernaut called Growth.
Growth is good, growth is God! But is it? The Random House dictionary
doesn’t seem to think so: “Def. 7 Pathol. - An abnormal increase in
a mass of tissue, as a tumor. “Growth for growth’s is the ideology
of the cancer cell.
Edward Abbey’s startling medical metaphor is very apt. The healthy
body of the ancient desert is indeed getting eaten up by the terrible
tumor of galloping growth. Which is now gnawing at the very fringes of
the Foothills (e.g., Terra Vita = Earth Life. Doublespeak right out of
Orwell’s”1984.” - and, of course, Tatum
Ranch-of-the-Touching-Desert-Billboards.)
Actually it’s in the Foothills - with the soon-to-be-five
green golf excrescences of Desert Mountain.
So when the President tells you next time that he is “promoting
growth” (as with NAFTA), and the Arizona governor and county
Supervisor Bruner seem anxious to install a baseball stadium (= growth)
and want you to tax-pay for the tumor yourselves, wait for a break in
the “Growth is good, growth is God!” chants...and tell ‘em, “No!”
Tell them that more is less and less is more. Tell them that life is
more than just lucre, that you and the land you’re on have had it with
their greed-driven growth. And that the desert is special - and so are
you. And that, “Growth is bad, growth is crud.”
“Excessive growth is an unhealthy, pathological and, finally, a
cancerous condition. There is nothing to be gained in striving to make
Tucson a foul mess like Phoenix. A few people profit - the land
speculator, the tract slum builders, the shopping mall hustlers - but
the majority of us lose. More growth means more crime, more smog, more
traffic, more noise, more political corruption, more polluted wells, and
less peace, less order, less nature, less freedom, less democracy.”
Edward Abbey.
* * *
Platts will present “Nature’s Own Penmen,” a reading of works
by John Muir, Edward Abbey and others, on Sunday, Jan. 23 [1994] at 7
p.m. at Changing Hands Books, Tempe.
Cost is $5; refreshments will be served. |
Posted December
2001
top
"Of This and That" by Geoffrey Platts
Foothills Sentinel, Wed., Aug. 6, 1986.
Foothills world traveler contemplates
differences in cultures
Today finds me in England's 'green and pleasant land." I came
here from Phoenix by a circuitous route - Newark, N.J., North Carolina
and Hamburg, West Germany!
In North Carolina I learned more about the sanguinary Civil War, saw
picturesque tobacco barns (those four-chimneyed, earth-chinked log huts
for drying the aromatic broad leaves) and found out that a
"pig-picking" is the Southern term for a suckling
roast-in-the-pit.
It was azalea time - and the beckoning Blue Ridge Mountains were vivid
with those pink and fragrant bushes.
In the center of Reidsville, N.C., where I stayed with hospitable
friends, the monument to the Confederate dead read - "God Bless
North Carolina and R.E. Lee."
The silent soldier on his weather-pitted pedestal faced southwards. It
was with considerable pleasure that I relished the pace and grace of the
South.
From there via Kennedy I flew to "London Town," arriving in
drizzle - not surprisingly! The dismal climate - was amply made up for
by the speed and efficiency with which I passed through U.K. Customs.
The British have an honor system. Those who have goods to declare pass
through the Red Exit. Those who do not, simply walk out with their
luggage through the green. The latter are occasionally spot-checked by
customs officers. There aren't the dreary hour-long waits experienced
regularly in, say, New York.
To make matters even more easy, hand-carts are available, free of
charge, to baggage-burdened travelers. All very civilized, I thought.
In spite of all the current brouhaha about bombs, I didn't lay eyes on a
single armed policeman at Heathrow Airport. That reassured me that
England is not under a state of siege.
On the contrary, the British seem to be even blase about the bomber
brigade. After recent explosions on Spain's Costa del Sol, one
vacationer was quoted as saying, "No way, I'm not going on holiday.
That's just what these terrorists want. To hell with 'em!"
Significantly, these incidents have caused no dent in the trend of
sharply increased bookings to Spain. People in Britain find it hard to
understand why Americans should want to cancel their summer vacations in
Europe.
A newspaper editorial put it tellingly... "If terrorist attacks on
American targets continue at the present rate, another five American
citizens will die in the next four months. That would leave Western
Europe almost 100 times safer than New York City where in 1985, an
average of 464 people were murdered every four months."
The American public needs to show the same robust attitude as
passers-by in Oxford Street, London, did after the recent bombing. We
cannot become cowed and intimidated y terrorism. As long as
Americans refuse to travel to Europe, they will be surrendering to
Qaddafi.
On the road I met a worldly American couple from Boston, Mass. They told
me that they'd been in Egypt the day after the Libyan bombardment - and
didn't have the slightest trouble.
I asked the feisty little lady's views on the mass U.S. Cancellations.
'Ridiculous!," she snorted. In short then, dear Foothills readers,
your chances of surviving a European vacation are excellent!
I didn't linger long in London. Just an overnight stay with friends and
then off to the continent. I was bound for Hamburg.
A sudden Belgian rail strike sent me off on a travel tangent. Instead of
crossing the channel by jetfoil at Dover, I took a boat from Harwich to
the Hook of Holland. Fair stood the wind for Holland! The sailing was
smooth - and I satisfied an ancient urge to be on the high sea again.
A Dutch train connecting with the Sea Link ferry sped directly to
Hamburg, dropping me off on a desert platform at 3 a.m. I simply
couldn't bring myself to call my German friends at that dreadful hour.
Besides I didn't have the correct "Kleingeld" to even make
that call.
So, in company with some poor dazed derelicts, I loitered at the station
for two hours - until the city began to stir to life. Then I 'phoned.
The four days in Hamburg, that riverport city of many trees, were
memorable. My charitable friends -and their friends - spared no effort
in making them so.
We talked of many things, marveling at the irony of having been on
different sides of the 1939-45 war when we were young. Once
"enemies," now fast friends. Time makes a mockery of man's
warring tendencies and fervent politics.
Gerhard and Kathe took me to Luneburg Heath (a large expanse of
commonland) to Lubeck, the old and graceful city where once my father
spent time with the post-war occupation forces.
There was a pleasing absence of those abominable ATCs on Luneburg. I was
advised that they were banned in Germany - because of their danger to
life and limb. If only U.S. authorities would do similarly!
From Hamburg to Hampstead in North London. Another satisfying sojourn
with old and cherished friends. I took much joy in wandering over
Hampstead Heath - a vast and rambling stretch of wildland, which is
protected from the predations of development forever.
One can walk for miles on the Heath with no sense of the great city
surrounding it. Its special beauty lies in its wildness. Because of
that, it could never be described as a park.
Characterful pubs, several centuries old, dot its periphery. There the
weary walker can quench a thirst with an imperial pint of good English
ale...
The elegant township of Hampstead reeks of history. It was once a
country venue for artists, philosophers and writers.
Even old Karl Marx wandered these parks - and is, in fact, buried nearby
in Highgate Cemetery. Painter John Constable, psychiatrist Sigmund
Freud, poet John Keats, novelist D.H. Lawrence, author George Orwell,
writer Katherine Mansfield. All these luminaries lived here at some time
or other. Blue porcelain plaques mark their erstwhile residences.
One cannot help treading these time-honored streets without a certain
reference. Perhaps most curious of all, historically, was the polished
brass plate reading as follows: "This building was erected by
voluntary contribution for a dispensary and soup kitchen. It was
intended as a thanks offering to Almighty God for his special mercy in
sparing this parish during the visitation of cholera in the year 1849.
Site was purchased in 1850 and the building completed in 1853. He shall
deliver thee from the noisome pestilence."
As I finish writing this column, it occurs to me that since the middle
of April I've experienced (at an intimate level) four decidedly
different cultures - the Mexican, the American, the German and the
English. They all have their pluses and minuses, their pros and cons.
And each way of life is distinct in its approach to the living of it. To
that I say, "Vive la difference!"
There is a unifying principle, however, which is held in common by all
cultures mentioned: the lovely capacity for the people's kindness and
warmth towards the traveler.
That form of hospitableness, as old as the human race itself, transcends
all political, national and linguistic barriers. And, if it continues to
be cultivated in good heart and spirit, may well hold the key to
"Peace on earth and goodwill to all men." |
|
Posted October
2001
top
Pen Points by Geoffrey Platts
Foothills Sentinel, Wed., Oct. 2, 1985.
All forms of life deserve reverence
All forms of life deserve reverence. In the least
significant is hidden the key to the most significant. All works of life
are significant - yes, marvelous, surpassing and inimitable. Life does not
busy itself with useless trifles. To issue from the workshop of nature; a
thing must be worth of nature's loving care and most painstaking art.
Should it not be worthy of your respect, at least? Mikhail Naimy
The very first thing I saw in Carefree the other day was a bulldozer
brutally biting into a Palo Verde, our state tree. The entire site, slated
for an office complex, was stripped to bare earth by the end of that day.
The place of this desolation is along Cave Creek Road, just east of
"Our Place" restaurant.
Recoiling from this shocking sight, I thought yet again of Albert
Schweitzer's credo of reverence for life. And realized, sadly, that our
world of speed and greed still has so very far to go before reaching such
a reverence.
An immense pity really because only when, as a society, we learn to revere
Nature, will we come to revere the humanity in one another. On that
far-off day the world will become a pleasant and peaceful place. I can
say, in all truth, that I never met a lover of Nature who I did not like
as a human being. If that sounds unreasonable, then think back on your own
encounters with people in Nature.
There was a ray of insight and wisdom in a recent letter to the editor,
quoting Schweitzer also. A Cave Creek lady, bless her, wrote: "I hope
enough speak out that destroying this land fosters more destruction, and
more and more and more. Then what? The final destruction will not be seen
in the land only, but in the people - oldsters, youngsters and in
betweensters. I have worked with them all. People need nature."
Who, then, was this Albert Schweitzer? He was a man earlier this century
who first gained world renown as a concert organist. Then, in his
thirties, he abandoned this gift of great music and took up medicine.
When qualified as a doctor, he left for darkest Africa and spent the last
50 years of his long life tending the sick in a simple jungle hospital of
his own building.
The name for his philosophy (which he lived out religiously in his
day-to-day life) came to him in a moment of revelation while voyaging up
the Ogowe River in the Congo: "Reverence for life."
From that moment on, he showed reverence to all living things - not only
humans, but insects and plants, even. He pointed out, quite truly, that
all living things share the inextricable bond of life. That the fate of a
mere ant or leaf is finally that of a human being.
When the miracle that is life is removed from ant or leaf or human, then
all are equally leveled by death. It is life, vibrant and vivid, that
connects all animate creatures.
Therefore, Schweitzer reasoned, this living link must be honored and
revered. If you should think him hopelessly eccentric or wildly
impractical, then listen to how he explains his reverence of life in this
excerpt from his essay, "Man and Creature.."
To the truly ethical man, all life is sacred, including forms of life
that from the human point of view may seem to be lower than ours. He makes
distinctions only from case to case, and under pressure of necessity, when
he is forced to decide which life he will sacrifice in order to preserve
other lives. In thus deciding from case to case, he is aware that he is
proceeding subjectively and arbitrarily, and that he is accountable for
the lives thus sacrificed.
The man who is guided by the ethics of reverence for life stamps out life
only from inescapable necessity, never from thoughtlessness. He seizes
every occasion to feel the happiness of helping living things and
shielding them form suffering and annihilation.
Whenever we harm any form of life, we must be clear about whether it was
really necessary to do so. We must not go beyond the truly unavoidable
harm, not even in seemingly insignificant matters. The farmer who mows
down a thousand flowers in his meadow, in order to feed his cows, should
be on guard as he turns homeward not to decapitate some flower by the
roadside, just by way of thoughtlessly passing the time. For then, he sins
against life without being under the compulsion of necessity.
When we help an insect out of difficulty, we are only trying to compensate
for man's ever-renewed sins against other creatures.
I salute Schweitzer's sentiments - and aspire to such a reverence. Not an
easy thing to attain, though. It demands a daily, unending discipline of
awareness. It means, for example, making a conscious effort to avoid
trampling on ants and plants. It means remembering to help a struggling
bug out of a pail of water. It means making a special stop along a road to
shoo a snake to safety. Or relocating a rattlesnake in the desert instead
of killing it. It means leaving a spider in the house when it's doing no
harm.
No, I haven't forgotten people. It also means being kind, helpful and
considerate to unfamiliar persons as well as to friends and family.
Practicing loving-kindness, in short. All these extra exertions on behalf
of living things take time - of which we claim we don't have enough.
Does this make the discipline a dreary, joyless one, then? Schweitzer
thinks not.
Life outside of us is an extension of the life within us. This compels
us to be part of it and to accept responsibility for all creatures, great
and small. Life become harder when we live for others - but it also become
richer and happier.
I had the pleasure of running into an environmental companion-in-arms a
while ago. She was out collecting signatures in defense of our desert
(bless her, too). She mentioned that, whenever she and her husband next
build in the desert, their house will be raise on stilts. The native flora
and fauna will thus live undisturbed beneath them.
I was profoundly impressed. An agreeable way of desert-dwelling - yet one
with the bare minimum of ecological damage. Now that is reverence for
life.
But how many will delicately do likewise? Where is that sensitivity with
our "builder-brotherhood?" Seems that the vast majority of them
know only reverence for money. And the latter's a dead, inanimate thing.
By the way, it any of you reverential desert stewards would care to
comment on the wiping out of all the life-forms on that piece of
once-living desert mentioned at the start of this column, the telephone
number displayed on the site sign for the public's benefit is 488-____. Do
call that number. I don't believe the architect and builder know about our
community's desert-minded feelings.
In conclusion, I say: Hasten the day when reverence for life becomes an
integral part of our way. It will bear hidden gifts for us on a personal
and intimate levels, too. For, in the fullness of its fruition, reverence
for all life becomes ultimately reverence for self. And that must surely
be the loveliest of all human attainments.
A man is ethical only when life, as such, is sacred to him...that of
plants and animals as that of his fellow-men. And when he devotes himself
helpfully to all life that is in need of help. Albert Schweitzer |
|
Posted September
2001
top
Pen Points by Geoffrey Platts
Foothills Sentinel, Sept. 29-Oct 3, 1995.
Is land merely property?
As bulldozers bray and bash and crash all around us these
days, we can only feel despair for our local unparalleled Sonoran Desert -
which stood some 10,000 years to evolve and yet perished in a matter of
hours.
How did we, why did we reach a point where the living desert and all other
vital land became mere "property." Just a thing to be brought
and sold like, say, an automobile? While re-reading that uplifting little
book, Earth Prayers, 365 prayers, poems and invocations for honoring
the Earth (Edited by Roberts/Amidon), I came across this illuminating
passage:
"To the Ancients, as well as to many contemporary seekers, the world
is alive with spirit. The surrounding landscape is infused with creativity
and meaning - and each place speaks to us of the divine...
"This notion of a richly sacralized world may seem strange to the
mainstream western culture. We live in a secular landscape. We have been
taught to identify the sacred primarily with cathedrals, churches and
temples. The rest of he earth is considered real estate, a mere
"it" to be used as a resource for our benefit.
"This effort to desacralize the world, dispel its sacred aura, is
what made possible our commercial relationship to the land. It has allowed
us to plunder the natural world, destroying places of more power and
beauty than we will ever be able to recreate."
The writer puts it in a nutshell: If we take the awe, the mystery and
sense of sacredness out of the natural world, and if we rid ourselves of
or even bury our reverence for all life, then as a society we can allow
ourselves a free and fierce hand to treat the land as a lifeless
commodity. And to have at it pitilessly.
This we call "property rights," with much pomposity and false
passion. How did the Bard himself put it? "Full of sound and fury,
signifying nothing."
The beautiful but as yet unappreciated thing about that hallowed phrase
"property rights" is, thanks to poor English, it means just what
it says - the rights of property. And property, mostly meaning land, we
have the "privateers" calling out on its (not their) behalf -
without even knowing it. Delicious irony.
Bluntly, as long as land has monetary value on it, it and its non-human
inhabitants great and small will be gravely threatened. And the bitter
battle for its preservation will go on interminably.
Aldo Leopold, famed U.S. conservationist of earlier times, pegged it down
succinctly in two sentences: "We abuse land because we regard it as a
commodity belonging to us. When we see land as a community to which we
belong, we may begin to use it with love and respect." Hasten the
day.
As mentioned in a previous column, "Audubon" sanctuary program
for golf courses is pure hogwash. Carefree's Desert Forest G.C. was the
first to be sucked into the nature scam locally. One can only hope they
withdraw. An acutely embarrassing business.
New Times' Dave Plank looked into this and it seems that the
"Audubon" Society of New York State borrowed the eminent Audubon
name (it's not a proprietary name, remarkably), and cooked up an
"Audubon Sanctuary Program" purportedly to environmentally
counsel golf course superintendents and to help turn their courses into
"wildlife refuges." To get "sanctuary" status, all a
course has to do is register and pay $100. Turns out that this phony
"Audubon Society" of New York is supported by...yes, you
guessed, the U.S. Golf Association, Golf Course Superintendent
Association, American Society of Golf Course Architects, et al.
Needless to say, the bonafide National Audubon Society disavowed any
connection whatsoever, saying it opposes the construction of new golf
courses because "they remove land from wildlife habitat and use water
and pesticides to an extent that it is in direct conflict with its goals
of resource conservation and pollution reduction (New Times)."
Desert Forest G.C. is by no means the only one to be duped (or is it the
public that's being duped? I fear so) by this "Cooperative
Sanctuary" golf scam.
I suppose that even in their present heyday, golf courses are getting a
tad nervous about their declining ecological popularity and are seeking
ways to enhance their lousy environmental images. But to actually corrupt
the Audubon name? How low will they go?
NOTE: The Foothills Sentinel adds: Geoffrey Platts is an
environmentally-friendly freelance writer and long-time Desert Foothills
resident.
|
|